Eksiam & Partners Co., Ltd. · Tax Law Consultants · Bangkok, Thailand ไทย · EN · 中文
Tax Court Litigation

Tax Litigation in the Thai Courts

Litigation of tax cases in the Central Tax Court for those who have received an appeal decision and still have legal objections — covering analysis of the objections, drafting the plaint, preparing the evidence, and conducting the proceedings in court.

I.

How this service differs from the assessment appeal stage

Challenging a tax assessment involves two clearly separate stages. The first is an appeal to the Commission of Appeal under the provisions of the Revenue Code. The second, after the appeal decision is received, is litigation in the Central Tax Court, or in a Provincial Court authorized to conduct proceedings on behalf of the Central Tax Court. The tax litigation service on this page, handled by the firm’s lawyers, is aimed primarily at the second stage.

II.

The right to bring a tax case to court after the appeal decision

Where the tax law requires an objection or appeal to be made first, the right to file a case with the Central Tax Court under the Act on the Establishment of and Procedure for Tax Court B.E. 2528 (1985) arises only once the taxpayer has complied with the rules, procedures, and time limits prescribed by that law and the Commission of Appeal has decided the appeal under Section 32 to Section 34 of the Revenue Code. Court proceedings have their own procedure, conditions, and time limits, entirely separate from the appeal process.

Key principle: court litigation is a separate proceeding: The Central Tax Court is a specialized court that hears tax cases. Proceedings at this stage call for preparation on the facts, the law, and the evidence that differs from the appeal stage. Analyzing which objections carry enough weight for litigation at this stage, and assessing the financial impact during the proceedings, are a key part of the decision before the plaint is filed.
  • Deciding body. Commission of Appeal · Central Tax Court, or a Provincial Court authorized to conduct the proceedings on its behalf
  • Starting point. Notice of tax assessment from the assessment official · appeal decision from the Commission of Appeal
  • Form. Appeal in the form prescribed by the Director-General · plaint under the Tax Case Rules B.E. 2544 (2001) and the Act on the Establishment of and Procedure for Tax Court B.E. 2528 (1985)
  • Parties. The appellant and the Revenue Department officials · the plaintiff and the defendant under the law on tax court procedure
  • Time limits. Under the provisions applicable to the case · under the provisions applicable to the case — each case must be analyzed individually
III.

The plaint, the statement of defense, and preparing evidence

A plaint in a tax case must comply with the requirements that the Tax Case Rules B.E. 2544 (2001) prescribe for plaints in the Central Tax Court. It must state the facts in dispute, the provisions of law, notifications, orders, regulations, or rulings relied on in support of the objection, and a clear prayer for relief to the court, together with evidence gathered systematically that can prove the facts relied on.

IV.

Time limits and preserving the right to litigate

The time limit for bringing a tax case to court after the appeal decision follows the provisions applicable to the case. For example, Section 30 (2) of the Revenue Code requires the appellant to appeal against the decision of the Commission of Appeal to the Central Tax Court within 30 days from the date of receiving notice of the decision. However, the time limit in each case may differ depending on the type of assessment and the provisions relied on in the decision, and any possibility of applying for an extension of time must be analyzed case by case against the conditions prescribed by law. Taxpayers who would like an overview of the stages of a case before a consultation can read our guide to filing a case with the Central Tax Court (Thai)

Key principle: the time limit is a key factor to analyze first: Missing the time limit prescribed by law for bringing a case to court may affect the right to litigate under the provisions applicable to the case. It should therefore be analyzed from the moment the appeal decision is received, so that there is enough time to prepare the plaint and the evidence carefully before the proceedings go further.
  • Time limit for filing suit. For example, Section 30 (2) of the Revenue Code sets 30 days from the date of receiving notice of the appeal decision — the provisions applicable to a given case may differ · each case must be analyzed against the provisions relied on in the decision as soon as it is received
  • Applying for an extension of time. The law may allow an extension of time under prescribed conditions · this must be analyzed against the conditions set by the provisions applicable to the case — it is not an automatic right
  • Consequences of missing the time limit. This may affect the right to litigate in court under the relevant provisions · analyze immediately upon receiving the appeal decision to preserve your rights in full
  • Time to prepare the plaint. Enough time is needed to analyze the issues, prepare the documents, and draft a complete plaint in accordance with the Tax Case Rules B.E. 2544 (2001) · starting the analysis early after the decision is received ensures there is enough time
V.

Issues of law and fact before the court

Tax litigation in court requires preparation on several fronts at once — in particular, analyzing the appeal decision to identify the objections that carry enough weight, and distinguishing clearly which objections concern questions of fact and which concern questions of law.

VI.

The status of the duty to pay tax during court proceedings

The principle under Section 31 of the Revenue Code: Under Section 31 of the Revenue Code, an appeal is not a deferral of tax payment, and as a general rule litigation in court does not automatically suspend the duty to pay the assessed tax either. That duty continues as prescribed by law throughout the proceedings. The status of the duty, and how it is managed during the litigation, must be analyzed case by case under the relevant law and practice.
  • The duty to pay tax during the litigation. The duty continues as prescribed by law — court litigation does not automatically suspend it · financial risk management must be planned alongside the case strategy throughout the proceedings
  • The consequences of not paying on time. The amount may become tax arrears, with the surcharge continuing to accumulate · the accumulated financial burden must be calculated and factored into strategic decisions throughout the case
  • Routes under the law. The law provides certain routes concerning payment status during the litigation · this must be analyzed case by case under the relevant law and practice — it is not an automatic right
VII.

The role of the tax litigation team

The firm’s team of lawyers and legal consultants works systematically from the moment it is instructed, covering every stage of tax proceedings in the Central Tax Court, from analyzing the appeal decision through to managing the case at trial.

VIII.

Frequently asked questions

Tax court litigation in Thailand
When should a taxpayer consider litigation in the Tax Court?

Where the tax law requires an appeal to be made first, the taxpayer has the right to file a case in court only after complying with those provisions and receiving the final decision of the Commission of Appeal. If objections of fact or law of sufficient weight remain, the taxpayer may have the right to continue the case in the Central Tax Court under the Act on the Establishment of and Procedure for Tax Court B.E. 2528 (1985). Whether to proceed requires an analysis of the weight of the objections, the time limit under the provisions applicable to the case, and the financial impact during the proceedings, and this analysis should be carried out promptly after the appeal decision is received.

What is the time limit for filing a tax case after the appeal decision?

The time limit for filing a case with the Central Tax Court after receiving the appeal decision follows the provisions applicable to the case. For example, Section 30 (2) of the Revenue Code sets the time frame for filing suit after receiving the decision of the Commission of Appeal at 30 days from the date of receiving notice of that decision. However, the provisions applicable to other cases may set different time frames, so each case must be analyzed according to the type of assessment and the provisions relied on in the decision. Whether the time for filing suit can be extended must be considered case by case against the legal conditions and the relevant rulings.

What is the status of the duty to pay tax during court proceedings?

Under Section 31 of the Revenue Code, an appeal is not a deferral of tax payment, and as a general rule litigation in court does not automatically suspend the duty to pay the assessed tax either. The duty to pay the tax continues as prescribed by law. Failure to pay within the time limit may result in the amount being treated as tax arrears, and the surcharge continues to accrue until the date of payment. However, the law provides certain routes that must be analyzed case by case under the relevant practice and provisions, and these are not automatic rights.

What documents and evidence should be prepared for a tax case plaint?

A plaint in a tax case must comply with the requirements of the Tax Case Rules B.E. 2544 (2001). It must state the facts in dispute, the provisions of law, notifications, orders, regulations, or rulings relied on in support, and a clear prayer for relief to the court. The key documents to gather are the notice of tax assessment, the appeal and the supporting documents filed with the Commission of Appeal, the appeal decision, and the accounting and tax records relating to the assessed period, together with evidence that systematically supports the facts in dispute. In cases involving professional or technical issues, it may be necessary to obtain the opinion of a qualified person or an expert in the relevant field as part of the evidence, depending on the nature of each case.

Start here

When you need to prepare a case in the Central Tax Court

The statutory time limits for bringing a case to court affect your rights — analysis from the earliest stage keeps the court strategy strong and the time limits met.

+66 81 654 5922